Chapter 5
The Children

"The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people." Adolf Hitler

"As long as government is perceived as working for the benefit of children, the people happily will endure almost any curtailment of liberty." Rabbi Daniel Lapin

Nobody who wants to gain power and popularity among the people can do so if that person is perceived to be someone who does injury to children. For example, we have seen that the people will keep supporting a politician who has affairs with other women, as long as those other women are adults and the economy is perceived to be doing well. But let word get out that a politician the people trusts has had sexual relations with a child of, say, 12 years old. Such a politician's popularity ratings would no doubt drop like a rock.

The greatest of tyrants have been perceived by the people as friends of the children. Hitler is but one example. I recall watching a television documentary on the Hitler Youth where a woman who was in the Hitler Youth was being interviewed. She recalled how proud she was to be part of the organization. She also stated that she never once thought herself to be a slave.

In 1912 the Congress passed an act that created the Federal Children's Bureau. The person who fought hardest for the formation of this Bureau was a woman named Florence Kelley. Mrs. Kelley always appeared as someone who worked for the benefit of children and believed that the federal government should play a big role in the welfare of children. She spoke before Congress from time to time about her stand on child welfare issues. In a Senate committee hearing held in May, 1920, Mrs. Kelley said: "Why does Congress continue to wish to have mothers and babies to die?"(1) Later that year before the House committee hearings held December 20-29th, Mrs. Kelley stated:

"This is the week of the child, who was born and laid in a manger, and this is the time when people's minds turn especially to children; and those people who will go to church on Christmas Eve and on Christmas day will be reminded, not only of the child that was born that day but of the circumstances under which that child was born. And the story of Herod will be in everybody's mind. We do not know how many children were slaughtered by Herod; history does not record that. But the deaths of those children have remained in the minds of the human race for nearly 2000 years; and the Congress now, after its long delay and its failure to interest itself in those daily deaths of 680 children - or 20,000 children a month - has to choose where it will be recorded in history."(2)

What Mrs. Kelly wanted was money for putting into operation the Sheppard-Towner Maternity and Infancy Act. This act was to aid pregnant mothers. Out of every 1000 live children born at the time, there were around 76 children who died at or shortly after birth. Hence, it was estimated that around 680 children died each day in America. Great strides have been made in the field of medicine since, but I wonder how many children die every day in today's society if we combine abortions with children who die at or shortly after birth? What really has been accomplished by spending enormous sums of the people's money?

Congressional acts such as this create more government administrators and other workers who are supported by tax money. Social legislation creates social workers. The jobs have great pay and benefits far above what the average worker receives. These are the people that dole out the labor that is taxed from the workers to the beneficiaries and lobby politicians for more money. In short, A is enslaved to provide benefits for B and to also contribute to the fat salaries of those who keep A enslaved. This is made possible because the disciples of slavery are perceived to be working for the benefit of children. These are the same people who lay claim upon the labor of children after they are born by assigning them numbers that identify the child's labor as the property of the State. The disciples claim to be acting in the children's best interest, and then they enslave the children at birth. I ask a question: Is it in the best interest of the child to enslave the child? - to destroy its right to free labor at birth? Why is Congress enslaving the children?

Think of the billboards on the highways in relation to drunk driving. They always use the children by placing a baby or young child on the billboard stating the child's name and then "killed by a drunk driver." People of all ages are killed by drunk drivers and, for that matter, killed in accidents in general. But since the politicians have always used the children to further their aims, you will never see grandma on the billboard or any other adult who was killed by a drunk driver. Using the children to pull at the heartstrings of the people allows the politicians to plunder at their pleasure, for the people perceive the politicians as working for the benefit of children.

According to the Census Bureau, all forms of government control around 47% of the national income. This means that around 180 days of your labor is taken each year to support government. This is more than Medieval Lords took from their serfs, and the serfs were slaves, even though they were not sold as chattel property. A couple trying to raise a family today usually has both parents working. One parent is nothing more than a wage slave who pays all the taxes, and the other parent's labor supports the family. We must consider the status of the workers before they are married and begin having children. If their labor is free then their children will follow the same condition; if they are slaves then the children will be slaves. Since mommy and daddy have numbers that identify their labor as State property, their children follow the same condition. This is merely the continuation of a slave maxim called partus sequitur ventrem. It has applied to all institutions of slavery.

Partus sequitur ventrem - the offspring follows the condition of the mother. Bouvier's Law Dict., 1934 ed., pg. 784

The status of slavery bastardizes the marriage, but where is the master? When a people are in a servile condition, what are the responsibilities of the master class? In pre civil war times, J.H. Hammond said that it was the duty of masters "to clothe, feed, nurse, support through childhood, and pension in old age, a race of slaves."(3) Chancellor Harper stated that "Security is one of the compensations of their humble position."(4) Interestingly, the Cherokee term for slavery was Asti nasha ‘i, and it referred to any creature that required care, animal or human. Even the Indians knew that slavery was a trade-off, and that in exchange for exploiting the labor of a slave, they had a corresponding duty to care for the slave. The responsibilities of masters are best summed up by E.N. Elliott, who was the editor of Cotton is King and president of Planters' College, Mississippi back then.

"Slavery is the duty and obligation of the slave to labor for the mutual benefit of both master and slave, under a warrant of the slave to protection, and a comfortable subsistence, under all circumstances. The person of the slave is not property, no matter what the fictions of the law may say; but the right to his labor is property, and may be transferred like any other property, or as the right to the services of a minor or an apprentice may be transferred. Nor is the labor of the slave solely for the benefit of the master, but for the benefit of all concerned; for himself, to repay the advances made for his support in childhood, for present subsistence, and for guardianship and protection, and to accumulate a fund for sickness, disability, and old age. The master, as the head of the system, has a right to the obedience and labor of the slave, but the slave also has his mutual rights in the master; the right of protection, the right of counsel and guidance, the right of subsistence, the right of care and attention in sickness and old age. He also has a right in his master as the sole arbiter in all his wrongs and difficulties, and as a merciful judge and dispenser of law to award the penalty of his misdeeds. Such is American slavery, or as Mr. Henry Hughes happily terms it, ‘Warranteeism.'"(5)

So we can see that the masters of pre civil war times had a social security system for their slaves. The labor of millions of slaves produced enormous sums of money which the slaveholders redistributed to provide social security to their slaves. This is why George Fitzhugh took the position that domestic slavery was the very best form of socialism because nothing was wasted and the master-slave relationship could not be denied by using legal fictions. This is why he said that masters "support the sick, infant, and aged slaves from the labor of the strong and healthy."(6)

I ask you: In exchange for your labor does today's masters help pay for your shelter?; your food?; your medical expenses?; or your children? Who is it that supports the children today should a marriage be destroyed in accordance with law? The masters or the slaves? It should be obvious that today's masters will deny that they are enslaving anyone. They will deny that they are even masters, even though they feast upon the people's labor and jail people by the thousands who resist the yoke.

We can see today that the disciples of slavery are trying to firmly root a maxim in the law where all biological parents have an obligation to support their own offspring. Hence the child support system. Interesting that the children are ordered by law to be supported by their biological parents, but the aged who receive benefits such as social security, medicare and medicaid, are to be supported by society as a whole. In one instance we are compelled by law to support people who are our blood relatives, and in another instance we are compelled by law to support those who are not.

The child support system is the most odious system that has developed as we have traveled down the path of increasing servitude. The propaganda that feeds people's minds is one sided to condition the public mind to accept the system and look with scorn upon people who get behind or quit paying their child support. This makes perfect sense, for the people don't even give a thought to the fact that this system absolves the master class of their responsibility to support the slaves' offspring. The non-custodial slaves who resist the yoke are labeled as "deadbeat parents" and are branded with infamy. Half of the slave's labor isn't enough to take should the slave's bastardized marriage be dissolved. If it means enslaving multitudes into the levels of slavery the Nazis imposed upon the Jews, so be it. If this is what it takes for the master class to stay in power, so be it.

The family court and child support systems are a development of recent times. All of the volumes of press I have gone through back in the 1930's and 1940's mention nothing of a family court or child support system. Neither do the judicial decisions of that time. But in 1930, for example, the divorce rate was 17%. Today it is around 50%. In 1930, the worker labored around 60 days per year to support government. Today it is around 180 days. Interesting, as the servitude to support government increases, so does the divorce rate. This makes sense. Labor is the foundation of the support of a family. The more labor you take away from the worker, the more you diminish the family unit's support. The family unit dies the death of slow starvation, and when these family courts destroy a marriage, they enslave and plunder at pleasure. The children are merely articles of property that are usually given to the mother and the father is enslaved with a child support order. This is true in around 90% of the cases. The enslavement does an effective job of destroying the bond between child and father. The non-custodial slaves are jailed without the right to counsel or a jury trial. While incarcerated the non-custodial slaves still have the child support charged against their labor, even though the incarceration bars them from submitting to the yoke. The suicide rate among these types of slaves is 16 times the national average while incarcerated. The disciples have done their perfect work in crushing the spirit of the slave to such a degree that the slave takes his own life. I wonder what the death toll is from this suicide pogrom?

Those who support this odious system need to seriously think about what they are allowing to happen with the law. Criminal penalties now exist at both the federal and state levels which allow these slaves to be thrown in jails and prisons at the sole discretion of star chamber judges. They are denied the right to counsel and the right to a jury trial. They are denied a drivers license. They are denied passports or their passports are revoked. The child support continues to be charged against their labor while incarcerated. They are used as slaves while incarcerated, thus creating a labor camp system (in the Soviet Union under Stalin the labor camp system was called the Gulag). The state subsidizes each inmate so that the jails can make a profit from warehousing the slaves, thus giving the incentive to incarcerate more slaves. We continually see slave-house (jail) expansions around the country, and the slaves are used to do the work in many instances. Their condition is worse than a pre civil war slave and the courts deny that there is any slavery in what the State is doing. Those who believe that the laws which empower the State to do these things will never effect them are living in a delusion. These laws are also becoming more oppressive and tyrannical with time. Some of them allow a judge to incarcerate a slave for up to 5 years in prison and brand the slave with a class three felony. How can courts that do these things be called "family courts" when their primary function is destroying families by the millions and enslaving people? It is as absurd as calling courts that execute people by the millions as "living courts."

These tyrannical laws which deny due process of law and enslave people are taking deeper and deeper root in our system. It will not be necessary to re-write these laws to apply them to other classes of people the disciples of slavery want to go after. All that will be necessary will be to apply them to the other classes of people. Logically, the next class of people that the disciples will go after are the millions of people who no longer file and pay income tax on their labor. Jury trials get in the way and slow things down. Perhaps the next class after this will be the people who refuse to allow their children to be taught in the school systems of the disciples.

"These manifestations of mutual kindness were not interrupted by an ordinance of Parliament, passed in 1643, appointing the earl of Warwick, governor in chief and lord high admiral of the colonies, with a council of five peers, and twelve commoners, to assist him; and empowering him, in conjunction with his associates, to examine the state of their affairs; to send for papers and persons; to remove governors and officers, appointing others in their places; and to assign over them such part of the powers then granted as he should think proper. Jealous as were the people of New England of measures endangering their liberty, they do not appear to have been alarmed at this extraordinary exercise of power. So true is it that men close their eyes on encroachments committed by that part to which they are attached, in the delusive hope that power, in such hands, will always be wielded against their adversaries, never against themselves."(7)

The enslavement and persecution of an entire class of people and the alienation of them from their children is a very serious matter in the eyes of the Creator. Just because the truth is hidden from us does not mean that the truth is dead, even though it may be dead in the minds and hearts of the disciples of slavery. The disciples are merely using the children as a tool to hide the real truth behind the whole family court and child support system. The disciples of slavery, in order to hide what they are, and in order to retain all of their wealth and power, have set up this odious system that adds another layer of servitude upon workers who were already slaves to start with.

"Woe unto the world because of offenses! For it must needs be that offenses come; but woe to that man by whom the offense cometh!"(8)

Look at the wealth that the disciples have in comparison to the common serf. One of the presidential candidates who sought the nomination of one of the ruling parties in the year 2000 election cycle had wealth estimated at around $400 million. The candidate who won the presidential election had wealth estimated at over $16 million at the time. The outgoing president had wealth measured in the millions of dollars. This is but the tip of the iceberg. Compare this to the young worker who, after taxes and child support, is left with around $80 per week to live on. Will any of the disciples of slavery ever sacrifice any of their wealth to help support the offspring of the serfs?

"And, behold, one came and said unto him, 'Good Master, what good things shall I do, that I may have eternal life?' And he said unto him, ‘Why callest thou me good? There is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.' He saith unto him, ‘Which?' Jesus said, ‘Thou shalt do no murder, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Honor thy father and thy mother: and, Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself.' The young man saith unto him, ‘All these things I kept from my youth up: what lack I yet?' Jesus said unto him, ‘If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come and follow me.' But when the young man heard that saying, he went away sorrowful: for he had great possessions. Then Jesus said unto his disciples, ‘Verily I say unto you, that a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven. And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.'"(9)

Human nature does not change when it comes to wealth and power. The disciples of slavery will not sacrifice their wealth in any way that will adversely affect their interests, even if it means retaining their wealth by enslaving the poor and using the children as a tool to accomplish the objective. People who use "the best interests of the child" as a smoke screen to enslave and persecute the poor are not people who administer justice. On the contrary, they are the children's worst enemy. They retain their wealth and power by warring against the bond of love between parent and child. Mammon is their god. They are the vilest of hypocrites.

"Then said he unto the disciples, ‘It is impossible but that offenses will come: but woe unto him, through whom they come! It were better for him that a millstone were hanged around his neck, and he cast into the sea, than he should offend one of these little ones."(10)

"Whenever the subject is discussed, we are told, that through the lenity of the master, the slave suffers less than the laborer in most other countries. He has more comforts, we hear. He is happier. To this refuge the slaveholder always flies..... Were one of our governments, by an act of usurpation, to abridge the free motions and the rights of the laboring class, would it be a mitigation of the wrong, that the laborer still exceeded in privileges and means of pleasure the serfs of Russia? It is no excuse for keeping a man in the dust, that you throw him better food than he can earn by his free industry. Be just before you are generous.... Some highwaymen have taken pride in the gentlemanly, courteous style, in which they have eased the traveler of his purse. They have given him back a part of the spoils, that he might travel comfortably home. A criminal relation cannot be made virtuous by the mode of sustaining it." William Channing, 1839

1. The Roosevelt Coup D'Etat of 1933-40, by Sterlin E. Edmunds; Gospel Ministries Publications, Boise, Id., 1995, pg. 54 (originally printed in 1940)
2. Ibid., pp. 54-55
3. Cotton is King and Pro-Slavery Arguments; Pritchard, Abbot, & Loomis, Augusta, Ga., 1860, pg. 647
4. Ibid., pg. 572
5. Ibid., pg. vii
6. Cannibals All! - Or Slaves Without Masters, by George Fitzhugh; Harvard Univ. Press, 1960, pg. 27 (originally published in 1857)
7. The Life of Washington, by John Marshall; The Citizen's Guild, 1926, Vol. I, pp. 115-16
8. Matthew 18:7
9. Matthew 19:16-24
10. Luke 17:1-2

"I will cram the truth down any honest man's throat, until he cannot deny it, and I will cram the lie down his throat till he shall cry enough! It is preposterous - it is the most damnable effrontery that man ever put on to conceal a scheme to defraud and cheat the people out of their rights, and then claim credit for it." Senator Lyman Trumbull, 1858

Home